- 1 Versioning and Releases
- 2 What are the Runtime OpenGL Version Requirements ?
- 3 Use and test Autobuilds
- 4 Bugreports & Testing
- 5 Get the Source Code
- 6 How to build
- 7 How to participate and use git
- 8 Common Runtime Problems
- 9 How to develop Cross-Device Applications
- 10 How to use JOGL in Applets (part 1)
- 11 What is Newt's Threading Model for native window events ?
- 12 How to use Newt with multiple Windows & Threads
- 13 Why using AWT for high performance is not a good idea ?
- 14 Why using Swing for high performance is not a good idea ?
- 15 Using OpenGL without a visible component
What are the Runtime OpenGL Version Requirements ?
The current JOGL2 spec is in WIP state, but mostly finished. We do not require any extra features of GL versions > 1.1, hence it shall just work.
E.g. if you want to
- support OpenGL platforms not supporting a version > 1.2
- use GL ≥ 1.3 features optionally
Just query their availability e.g.:
If you call a > 1.2 GL function where it is not available, a GLException is thrown.
JOGL requires at least an OpenGL version 1.1, due to it's dynamical function binding starting with OpenGL 1.2.
Use and test Autobuilds
I like to summarize how to manually test the JOGL autobuilds, starting with 2010-11-10.
You can fetch autobuilds from one the referenced locations, pick the autobuild folder if you like to test autobuilds.
Runtime Version Check
The simplest verification of a JOGL build is to use the runtime version check.
For JOGL, it should run 2 tests.
- Just the VersionInfo of the JAR's manifest file
- VersionInfo plus OpenGL platform information
The first test does not involve any native method calls and shall always succeed, where the latter initializes the native libraries and OpenGL, which information is being dumped as well.Both results are dumped to the file
which you should send to us in case of a bugreport.
Let’s assume we are in the test directory ‘test’, from which we operate from this point.
- Get jogl-demos.zip. Extract the archive, i.e.
- Get jogl-2.0-pre-20090702-linux-amd64.zip. In case we have build a reference implementation (RI) the substring ‘pre-yyyymmdd-’ will be dropped. Replace the version 2.0 with the latest available and the OS/arch linux-amd64 with your test platform. Extract the archive, ie
unzip jogl-2.0-pre-20090702-linux-amd64.zip. Create a symbolic link or rename the archive directory from jogl-2.0-pre-20090702-linux-amd64 to jogl, ie
ln -s jogl-2.0-pre-20090702-linux-amd64 jogl.
- If you like to test the binding to NV’s Cg, download and install
We assume java is in your binary search path.
On X11/Unix and MaxOSX you can test the build as follows:
sh java-run-newt.sh demos.es2.RedSquare -GL2 -GL2 -GL2 sh java-run.sh demos.gears.Gears
and with debug output
sh java-dbg-newt.sh demos.es2.RedSquare -GL2 -GL2 -GL2 sh java-dbg.sh demos.gears.Gears
On Windows you shall be able to run:
java-win32.bat demos.es2.RedSquare -GL2 -GL2 -GL2 java-win32.bat demos.gears.Gears
and with debug output
java-win32-dbg.bat demos.es2.RedSquare -GL2 -GL2 -GL2 java-win32-dbg.bat demos.gears.Gears
The windows scripts are pretty simple and flat.
The magic unix scripts offer more features and can be used either in the autobuild environment or in your development one.
setenv-jogl.sh <JOGL-PROFILE> [<jogl-build-dir>]
Looks up and invokes profile.jogl, finds gluegen, sets the environment variables (CLASSPATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH & PATH).
jogl/etc/profile.jogl <JOGL-PROFILE> [<jogl-build-dir>]
JOGL profiles are one of JOGL_ALL, JOGL_ES1_MIN, JOGL_ES1_MAX, JOGL_ES2_MIN, JOGL_ES2_MAX, JOGL_GL2ES12_MIN, JOGL_GL2ES12_MAX, JOGL_GL2_MIN, JOGL_GL2_MAX. Looks up the set of JAR files necessary to satisfy the chosen JOGL-PROFILE.
This allows you to test a specific environment, ie ES2 without GL2 and AWT, using JOGL_ES2_MIN. For this case I would recommend the native ES2 implementation from imageon SDK_OGLES2_LINUX_PCEMULATION_2.02.22.0756.
Bugreports & Testing
For all bug reports, please add the following information to your email:
Please perform a runtime version check, which provides the following information:
- OS & version
- Java version (java -version)
- JOGL version
- GIT revision
- Autobuild version
Detailed Bug Information
- Your Test case
- Source code, or reference to it if possible
- Invocation command-line
- Exceptions, stdout/stderr log file
If possible, please add the following system properties to enable DEBUG logging: -Dnewt.debug=all -Dnativewindow.debug=all -Djogl.debug=all
java -Djava.awt.headless=true -Dnewt.debug=all -Dnativewindow.debug=all \ -Djogl.debug=all demos.es2.RedSquare 2>&1 | tee RedSquare.report.log
To test applets use the jcontrol panel or edit ~/.java/deployment.properties directly and
- Add JRE Arguments:
-Djava.awt.headless=true -Dnewt.debug=all -Dnativewindow.debug=all -Djogl.debug=all
- Enable logging/trace
- Show the console window, or just use th latest log-file in
Get the Source Code
Create a local copy/branch of the git repository, either anonymous:
- git clone git://github.com/sgothel/gluegen.git gluegen
- git clone git://github.com/sgothel/jogl.git jogl
- git clone git://github.com/sgothel/jogl-demos.git jogl-demos
or via SSH and your user credential, so you can easily push back your changes to the github server:
- git clone firstname.lastname@example.org:username/gluegen.git gluegen
- git clone email@example.com:username/jogl.git jogl
- git clone firstname.lastname@example.org:username/jogl-demos.git jogl-demos
How to participate and use git
Yes, gluegen, jogl and all the stuff has been migrated to git, thanks to the great git toolchain.
In the past we were using a centralized repository only, SVN, and you really needed access to it as a developer.
Thanks to the distributed nature of git, this is no more a real issue. The only thing left is to provide a media to offer your branch to one of us, this can be via email, http, git, ssh, whatever you wish - it's easy. For bigger projects maintained in a branch or if you don't have your own public server to offer yours, we are pleased to grant you write access to our repository!
However, don't just modify the master branch without our permission, or any other existing branch which is not assigned to you! We will just trust you here, but if you misbehave, your privileges will be removed. Instead, create a branch of your own and push it to the server, then you will ask one of us to pull your branch, which we will verify and merge, if it's fine. Thanks to git, this is so easy now. And this is the current way how you collaborate using a distributed SCM.
Common Runtime Problems
X11: OpenGL library is not picked up correctly, no OpenGL available
In case you are running a DRI machine, eg ATI's proprietary driver or an open source one, you may need to ensure that the environment variable LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH is set properly.
I ran into this while testing the 32bit builds on a 64bit machine as a different user. Since LIBGL_DRIVERS_PATH is only setup for the desktop user on Ubuntu, some /etc/X11/Xsession.d/ script, I couldn't get a GL context to work.
So I had to set mine to the value:
See also: Ubuntu fglrx bug entry
How to develop Cross-Device Applications
First you have to pick your lowest common denominator of an OpenGL profile, ie OpenGL ES1 or ES2. For either we offer an intersecting desktop GL profile, GL2ES1 or GL2ES2. Use the latter while creating your GLCapabilities. Build and run your application with the minimum GL profile JARS, e.g. on the desktop use:
~/jogl-demos> . ./setenv-jogl.sh JOGL_GL2ES12_MIN ../jogl/build
Here you are on a Unix platform (not Window) and your common build subdirectory is 'build'. jogl-demos/setenv-jogl.sh is provided within jogl-demos, which itself utilizes jogl/etc/profile.jogl.
This uses the GlueGen/JOGL JARS:
On a mobile device using CVM, you would use:
- jogl.gles1.cdc.jar or jogl.gles2.cdc.jar
Please check JOGL Deployment also.
Now, the same Java application shall run on all devices, desktop and mobile. See demos.es1.RedSquare of the jogl-demos repository.
On the desktop you may run the ES1 demo:
~/jogl-demos> sh java-run-newt.sh demos.es1.RedSquare -GL2ES1
and the output is:
null RedSquare.run() 0 User screen size 0x0 Detected screen size 1920x1200 GLProfile[GL2ES1/GL2ES12] Entering initialization GLProfile[GL2ES1/GL2ES12] GL Profile: GLProfile[GL2ES1/GL2ES12] GLProfile[GL2ES1/GL2ES12] GL:com.sun.opengl.impl.gl2es12.GL2ES12Impl@b815859 GLProfile[GL2ES1/GL2ES12] GL_VERSION=3.0.0 NVIDIA 185.18.14 GLProfile[GL2ES1/GL2ES12] GL_EXTENSIONS: ..
How to use JOGL in Applets (part 1)
A Java Applet using JOGL may utilize 2 methods
Standard JNLP Applets are supported starting with Java 6u14, however, if you run MacOSX or an older version of Java, you may need to use the Applet-Launcher.
Below we utilize both, the standard JNLP mechanism of 6u14 as the default, or falling back to our Applet-Launcher.
You will find the JNLP file applet-gears.jnlp further below, which is being used in case of a JNLP launch, otherwise it is ignored and the archive tags are being used, hence the applet-launcher will be started.
The below demo is online here.
Note: It is important for the startup time to have the same JVM arguments in the applet tags, as well as within the JNLP applet description, here see property sun.java2d.noddraw. Only if JVM arguments of the JNLP applet description are satisfied by the applet tag’s JVM, the plugin will not need to start a new JVM. OF course, the applet tag’s JVM spec may exceed the JNLP applet’s one.
Note: A bug on MacOSX is known, launching 2 JOGL applets in 2 tabs.
<applet code="org.jdesktop.applet.util.JNLPAppletLauncher" width=600 height=400 archive="http://download.java.net/media/applet-launcher/applet-launcher.jar, http://download.java.net/media/jogl/jsr-231-2.x-webstart/nativewindow.all.jar, http://download.java.net/media/jogl/jsr-231-2.x-webstart/jogl.all.jar, http://download.java.net/media/gluegen/webstart-2.x/gluegen-rt.jar, http://download.java.net/media/jogl/jsr-231-2.x-demos-webstart/jogl-demos.jar"> <param name="codebase_lookup" value="false"> <param name="subapplet.classname" value="demos.applets.GearsApplet"> <param name="subapplet.displayname" value="JOGL Gears Applet"> <param name="noddraw.check" value="true"> <param name="progressbar" value="true"> <param name="jnlpNumExtensions" value="1"> <param name="jnlpExtension1" value="http://download.java.net/media/jogl/jsr-231-2.x-webstart/jogl-core.jnlp"> <param name="java_arguments" value="-Dsun.java2d.noddraw=true"> <param name="jnlp_href" value="applet-gears.jnlp"> </applet>
Where the referenced JNLP file applet-gears.jnlp looks as follow:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <jnlp href="applet-gears.jnlp"> <information> <title>JOGL JNLP Applet Gears Demo</title> <vendor>Sun Microsystems, Inc.</vendor> <homepage href="http://jogl-demos.dev.java.net/"/> <description>Gears Demo</description> <description kind="short">Brian Paul's Gears demo ported to Java and JOGL.</description> <offline-allowed/> </information> <resources> <j2se href="http://java.sun.com/products/autodl/j2se" version="1.4+"/> <property name="sun.java2d.noddraw" value="true"/> <jar href="http://download.java.net/media/jogl/jsr-231-2.x-demos-webstart/jogl-demos.jar" main="true"/> <jar href="http://download.java.net/media/jogl/jsr-231-2.x-demos-webstart/jogl-demos-util.jar"/> <extension name="jogl-all-awt" href="http://download.java.net/media/jogl/jsr-231-2.x-webstart/jogl-all-awt.jnlp" /> </resources> <applet-desc name="Gears-Applet" main-class="demos.applets.GearsApplet" width="640" height="480"> </applet-desc> </jnlp>
What is Newt's Threading Model for native window events ?
As of today, Newt's default threading model to handle native events is the event dispatch thread (EDT) model.
It's introduction was necessary to allow a 'peace of mind', high performance and reactive solution of the dispatch event problem. Some OS, especially MS-Windows, require one to create the native Window and dispatch it's events from the same native thread. As it was easy to handle these requirements from a simple test application, as it is difficult to solve this from a framework operating with multiple temporary threads, a web browser for example.
Newt's EDT impl. creates one EDT per Display and calling thread, as the Display instance is unique per thread.
Using EDT is not mandatory, and you can turn it off in the NewtFactory, and deal with the event dispatch manually.
How to use Newt with multiple Windows & Threads
Newt is capable of handling multiple threads and windows.
For best performance, you may create one thread per window, if possible.
Below you see the invocation of the ES2 RedSquare jogl-demos utilizing multiple threads.
- Single thread (Unix, Win32)
java -Djava.awt.headless=true demos.es2.RedSquare -GL2
- Single thread (MacOSX)
java -XstartOnFirstThread -Djava.awt.headless=true demos.es2.RedSquare -GL2
- Multiple threads & windows (Unix, Win32)
java -Djava.awt.headless=true demos.es2.RedSquare -GL2 -GL2 -GL2 -GL2
- Multiple threads & windows (MacOSX)
java -XstartOnFirstThread -Djava.awt.headless=true com.sun.javafx.newt.util.MainThread demos.es2.RedSquare -GL2 -GL2 -GL2 -GL2
The serialization of the main Java class through com.sun.javafx.newt.util.MainThread may be used for all platforms, since it only takes effect on MacOSX. This allows you an almost platform independent invocation of your multithreaded Java applications.
On MacOSX, com.sun.javafx.newt.util.MainThread will occupy the main thread and serializes all native window related tasks through it. This mechanism is thread safe utilizes reentrant locking.
Why using AWT for high performance is not a good idea ?
AWT (on many implementations) holds the lock to the underlying native resources, e.g. X11 display, screen and window surface, hence we have to obey these locks for any GL action bound to such.
This is still pretty standard matter as long these locks only have to be applied to the actual resource in use.
On AWT, it turns out that we have to use the global JAWT toolkit lock for any native operation, ie OpenGL. This might not be a problem for a single threaded GL application, but if you start a multithreaded beast, you will recognize that it will stumble around.
You can verify this behavior with the ES1 RedSquare demo:
- AWT - No VSync - One Thread
java demos.es1.RedSquare -awt -swapi 0 -GL2 5s: 3379f, 675 fps, 1 ms/f; total: 5s, 675 fps, 1 ms/f
Even here you may experience some stuttering ..
If you force disabling the toolkit lock:
java -Dnativewindow.nolocking=true demos.es1.RedSquare -awt -swapi 0 -GL2
The demo may freeze forever .. due to native locking.
- NEWT - No VSync - One Thread
java -Djava.awt.headless=true demos.es1.RedSquare -swapi 0 -GL2 5s: 5958f, 1191 fps, 0 ms/f; total: 5s, 1191 fps, 0 ms/f
Runs much smoother .. without the stuttering locking experience ..
This becomes much clearer with more threads:
- AWT - No VSync - Three Threads
java demos.es1.RedSquare -awt -swapi 0 -GL2 -GL2 -GL2 5s: 772f, 151 fps, 6 ms/f; total: 5s, 151 fps, 6 ms/f
- NEWT - No VSync - Three Threads
java -Djava.awt.headless=true demos.es1.RedSquare -swapi 0 -GL2 -GL2 -GL2 5s: 1669f, 333 fps, 2 ms/f; total: 5s, 333 fps, 2 ms/f
Why using Swing for high performance is not a good idea ?
First, all this inherents all arguments from 'Why using AWT for high performance is not a good idea ?
Second, it involves compositioning using different methods, some may not be available on some platforms.
From fast to slow:
1.) External Java2D's GLContext and FBO object.
- GL stuff HW accelerated.
- Available on some platforms: Linux/Windows Sun's Java2D impl.
- Setup with System property 'sun.java2d.opengl' to 'true'.
- Renders directly into Java2D's FBO object, if available.
2.) Own PBuffer GLContext, which has to be composed.
- GL stuff HW accelerated.
- Available on most platforms: No dependency to Java2D implementation.
- Renders into an own offscreen drawable, and copies it over to AWT's BufferedImage.
3.) Own Pixmap GLContext, which has to be composed.
- GL stuff unlikely hw accelerated.
- Available on most platforms: No dependency to Java2D impl.
- Renders into an own offscreen drawable, and copies it over to AWT's BufferedImage.
As you see, no straight forward HW rendering is involved, assuming that even the windowing manager is using offscreen surfaces - you would have 2 compositions here already.
At least (1) would be 'acceptable' here, if available, but if only (2) is available - the performance would not match the state of the art!
Sure, it might be enough for some UIs or static pictures .. or so, otherwise, I would prefer the 'overlay' method, ie using a GLCanvas within a Swing component, while no menu is being shown.
However you do it .. the generic AWT 'restrictions' apply here as well.