<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.2"
          urlbase="https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/"
          
          maintainer="sgothel@jausoft.com"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>358</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-06-25 09:47:30 +0200</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Rendering on the browser....</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2015-09-27 03:14:51 +0200</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>0</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>0</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>3</classification_id>
          <classification>JogAmp</classification>
          <product>Jogl</product>
          <component>applet</component>
          <version>1</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>all</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>517</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Sven Gothel">sgothel</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Sven Gothel">sgothel</assigned_to>
          
          
          <cf_type>FEATURE</cf_type>
          <cf_scm_refs></cf_scm_refs>
          <cf_workaround>---</cf_workaround>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>374</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Sven Gothel">sgothel</who>
    <bug_when>2010-03-24 07:51:30 +0100</bug_when>
    <thetext>


---- Reported by vinodpatel2006 2008-06-25 21:47:30 ----

Hello,

       This is not the issue but i am requesting an enhancement in the JOGL API.
The problem is that JOGL does not able to render on the browser window. I must
have to use applet to render the 3D objects. But what if i have to render on the
browser window. Rendering on the browser window means i have to use browser
window as the drawable. That is possible using the C++, i can make browser
window as drawable and send all rendering things on that. I can provide the
examples also that this is possible in C++.

      I think that if that would be possible in the JOGL then it may be a great
feature and changes the impression of the JOGL.

      I am waiting for you decision......

Thanks and Regards



--- Bug imported by sgothel@jausoft.com 2010-03-24 07:51 EDT  ---

This bug was previously known as _bug_ 358 at https://jogl.dev.java.net/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=358

The original assignee of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the default assignee
   for the component, sgothel@jausoft.com.
   Previous assignee was aaronanderson.

</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>422</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Sven Gothel">sgothel</who>
    <bug_when>2010-03-24 11:49:08 +0100</bug_when>
    <thetext>As discussed with Rami and others before, 
this might be a big one.

Seamless integration with the windows(*1) of the browser
would need a high grade of interoperability ..

Two solutions I could think of for now:

1) Transparent overlay without decorations
   Such a new window could be attached to it&apos;s browsers parents
   with the right offset.
   What would not work properly here is if the target layer
   should be invisible.  

2) [Offscreen] render into target framebuffer of [sub] window
   Assuming all DIV layers are rendered offscreen, 
   composited by the browser. In case the AWT Applet&apos;s browser window
   is such an offscreen window, we query this property and follow suite.

More to come ..

---

*1) browser windows: all windows representing a renderable component,
    ie DIV layers - which are somehow stacked and composited by the browser.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1117</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Sven Gothel">sgothel</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-10 08:59:07 +0200</bug_when>
    <thetext>translucency support is handled w/ bug #517

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 517 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>