<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.2"
          urlbase="https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/"
          
          maintainer="sgothel@jausoft.com"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>398</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2010-05-18 05:55:15 +0200</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Provide OSGi Metadata In Builds</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-07-16 04:35:55 +0200</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>3</classification_id>
          <classification>JogAmp</classification>
          <product>Jogl</product>
          <component>core</component>
          <version>2</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>all</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CONFIRMED</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P5</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ed Kohlwey">ekohlwey</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Sven Gothel">sgothel</assigned_to>
          <cc>ghislain_nadeau</cc>
    
    <cc>sgothel</cc>
    
    <cc>wwalker3</cc>
          
          <cf_type>---</cf_type>
          <cf_scm_refs></cf_scm_refs>
          <cf_workaround>---</cf_workaround>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>450</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Ed Kohlwey">ekohlwey</who>
    <bug_when>2010-05-18 05:55:15 +0200</bug_when>
    <thetext>An increasingly large number of organizations are using JOGL in OSGi, each one individually adding their own MANIFEST.MF. It would be nice to see a standard manifest packaged in the JOGL jars.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1014</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Wade Walker">wwalker3</who>
    <bug_when>2011-07-23 02:29:19 +0200</bug_when>
    <thetext>Recent discussion of this at http://forum.jogamp.org/UnsatisfiedLinkError-when-trying-to-use-JOGL-in-an-Eclipse-plugin-td3178913.html#a3189906. More specifically:

On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 09:44:05 PM Wade Walker [via jogamp] wrote: 
&gt; 
&gt; I can try it, but you&apos;ll have to tell me where our packaging script is and 
&gt; how to test it (so I can make sure I don&apos;t mess it up). 

repo: jogamp-scripting 

https://jogamp.org/chuck/view/fwd/job/jogamp-scripting-promote-last-builds-master/

The above is the manual kicked off aggregation script: 

+++
#!/bin/bash 
mkdir -p log 
./hudson-builds/promote-latest-builds.sh master secure 2&gt;&amp;1 | tee log/jogamp-scripting-promote-last-builds-master-$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M).log
+++

If this helps as an entry to generate such OSGI bundle, awesome. 
Ping me (here, email, chat, ..) if I can help. 

ofc .. we still have to try to re-org the final release URLs and bundling, 
i.e. Rami, John and I thought it will be nice to have one zip for devs containing all components, gluegen, .. with the binaries and javadoc. 

we also like to have fixed URLs for each (old) version, just in case a user likes to link to a specific one. 

Cheers, Sven</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2810</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="JSlain">ghislain_nadeau</who>
    <bug_when>2013-07-16 04:35:55 +0200</bug_when>
    <thetext>Actually, this would still be usefull...</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>