727 2013-05-02 12:24:30 +0200 Missing documentation for JogAmp module utility classes. 2013-05-03 12:49:10 +0200 1 1 3 JogAmp General source_code unspecified All all RESOLVED INVALID --- enhancement --- 0 xerxes sgothel --- --- oldest_to_newest 2559 0 xerxes 2013-05-02 12:24:30 +0200 Jan Ekholm ‏@jan_ekholm 44m Sometimes JOGL code becomes a frankenmess of plain OpenGL and JOGL utility stuff. No docs really tell what the utility stuff does. 2560 1 sgothel 2013-05-02 20:38:20 +0200 I am sorry (not really, but just being polite here), but such a critique is itself a 'frankenmess' since it doesn't specify which modules lack documentation. Asking for a better documentation while being broad and unspecific is not constructive and itself lacks documentation. Many utility classes do have proper API documentation as well as covering unit test. The latter also demonstrate their usage. I have to admit, nothing is 100% perfect, but we need to ask for detailed question so we are able to better the product. Iff serious, and this would imply cooperation and commitment, I recommend to reopen this bug as a root bug entry and add subsequent child bugs blocking this one asking for missing documentation or clarification of specific modules. Sorry if this sounds harsh .. but we need to have a doable process w/ community as well. 2563 2 xerxes 2013-05-03 12:49:10 +0200 The best JogAmp module utility class documentation to date is inside the JogAmp JOGL javadocs: http://jogamp.org/deployment/jogamp-next/javadoc/jogl/javadoc/com/jogamp/opengl/util/package-summary.html and http://jogamp.org/deployment/jogamp-next/javadoc/jogl/javadoc/overview-summary.html