#jogamp @ irc.freenode.net - 20131012 05:05:32 (UTC)
20131012 05:05:32 -jogamp- Previous @ http://jogamp.org/log/irc/jogamp_20131011050532.html
20131012 05:05:32 -jogamp- This channel is logged @ http://jogamp.org/log/irc/jogamp_20131012050532.html
20131012 05:27:08 * [Mike] (~Mike]@anon) Quit ()
20131012 05:55:39 * [Mike] (~Mike]@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 08:33:59 * [Mike] (~Mike]@anon) Quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
20131012 09:32:01 * Khruu (~ircuser66@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 10:20:31 * monsieur_max (~maxime@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 10:58:26 * xranby (~xranby@anon) Quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
20131012 11:03:52 * xranby (~xranby@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 11:08:59 * xranby (~xranby@anon) Quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
20131012 11:10:53 * xranby (~xranby@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 12:26:16 * monsieur_max (~maxime@anon) has left #jogamp
20131012 15:33:38 * monsieur_max (~maxime@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 16:00:19 * xranby (~xranby@anon) Quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
20131012 16:04:26 * xranby (~xranby@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 16:30:16 * kermyt (~kermyt@anon) Quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
20131012 16:36:26 * kermyt (~kermyt@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 16:47:27 * xranby (~xranby@anon) Quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
20131012 16:48:33 * xranby (~xranby@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 17:23:36 * [Mike] (~Mike]@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 17:27:59 * xranby (~xranby@anon) Quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
20131012 17:35:18 * xranby (~xranby@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 18:11:17 <sgothel> Added 2.1.1 https://jogamp.org/wiki/index.php/SW_Tracking_Report_Objectives_for_the_release_2.1.1 - next bugfix release .. (Xerxes always right) :)
20131012 19:38:02 * kermyt (~kermyt@anon) Quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
20131012 19:41:05 * kermyt (~kermyt@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 19:59:10 * xranby-64 (~familjen@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131012 21:46:57 <sgothel> fixed / merged a bunch of JOCL bugs ..
20131012 22:14:10 <xranby-64> sgothel: was it fun?
20131012 22:14:39 <sgothel> like a blind man sticking to his craft trying not to worry about the big picture :)
20131012 22:19:32 <xranby-64> in other words.. some api changes all done to fix correctness :
20131012 22:20:48 <sgothel> err .. no api changes, but impl. changes following api for correctness .. yup
20131012 22:28:37 <xranby-64> ok.. right only some removed static imports
20131012 22:28:54 <sgothel> a bit more :)
20131012 22:29:17 <xranby-64> i have missed the details then :)
20131012 22:30:40 <sgothel> http://jogamp.org/git/?p=jocl.git;a=summary .. plus reviewing LixoMan's patch
20131012 22:30:49 <sgothel> nothing gets merged blindly here ofc :)
20131012 22:30:51 <xranby-64> meanwhile i have tested the new experimental dimeload distribution model created by two feral games developer. notindie. from england
20131012 22:31:16 <sgothel> ah .. dunno what that is ..
20131012 22:31:34 <sgothel> late dinner now - later cont. w/ Win8 touch ..
20131012 22:32:22 <xranby-64> their foss dimeload system basically allows small scale developers to engage their users in engagement marketing by,, first forcing people to buy download dimes... and then later people get enough dimes to share with their friends so .. people start promoting the software
20131012 22:33:27 <xranby-64> for example.. i as a end user can setup a page to promote the software, this is the engagement marketing part, http://dime.lo4d.net/dl/swpaint/553987
20131012 22:33:38 <xranby-64> the software itself is drm free and foss
20131012 22:34:11 <xranby-64> the link above points to a deluxepaint clone written in lua
20131012 22:35:06 <xranby-64> so all in all.. a new experiment on how get a ROI for foss work
20131012 22:35:14 <xranby-64> http://dime.lo4d.net/welcome
20131012 22:37:27 <xranby-64> a long story short.. the code behind this dimeload system is available under a mit license at https://bitbucket.org/xixs/pagecake
20131012 23:06:01 <ruzu> so, was that an advert or
20131012 23:13:14 <xranby-64> ruzu: more a heads up on new fos software distribuition models
20131012 23:13:18 <xranby-64> foss
20131012 23:13:40 <ruzu> i remember when blender did that
20131012 23:14:14 <xranby-64> ruzu: interesting, what happened, and did they do the engagement marketing aspect of it?
20131012 23:14:35 <ruzu> don't really remember the details tbh
20131012 23:16:07 <xranby-64> the last failed experiment i seen was bryan lunduke's donation only funding experiment: outcome http://lunduke.com/?p=4581
20131012 23:23:18 <xranby-64> ubuntu and processing.org have possibly switched to a possibly successful donation strategy. they put the donation page up in the face on all users who wants to download the software
20131012 23:24:55 <xranby-64> if they succeed then the main difference between processing.org/ubuntu and lunduke is when the donation page is presented
20131012 23:32:16 * xranby-64 (~familjen@anon) Quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
20131012 23:43:50 <sgothel> thank you Xerxes for sharing - yup, business models around free software is always on-topi
20131012 23:43:55 <sgothel> *on-topic
20131012 23:44:40 <ruzu> not sure how i feel about ubuntu though, they make quite a lot of money
20131012 23:50:35 <sgothel> oh .. it's not the money they make IMHO, but _how_ they do it (selling user data unknown to amazon, mir (no cooperation w/ major project[s], .. etc)
20131012 23:50:57 <sgothel> yeah, Canonical for me is like .. they switched sides .. :-/
20131012 23:51:57 <sgothel> same as Google .. .. well. Maybe I am too picky - good that we have Debian etc
20131013 00:14:00 * monsieur_max (~maxime@anon) has left #jogamp
20131013 05:05:32 -jogamp- Continue @ http://jogamp.org/log/irc/jogamp_20131013050532.html