#jogamp @ irc.freenode.net - 20131031 05:05:51 (UTC)


20131031 05:05:51 -jogamp- Previous @ http://jogamp.org/log/irc/jogamp_20131030050551.html
20131031 05:05:51 -jogamp- This channel is logged @ http://jogamp.org/log/irc/jogamp_20131031050551.html
20131031 05:21:15 <sgothel> https://jogamp.org/chuck/job/jogl/1128/label=linux-x86_64-amd/testReport/com.jogamp.opengl.test.junit.jogl.math/ <- ~ 9min :)
20131031 05:21:49 <sgothel> plus .. it fails on some machines https://jogamp.org/chuck/job/jogl/1128/testReport/
20131031 09:53:24 <sgothel> jogl-all < 1MB :)
20131031 09:53:29 <sgothel> (pack200)
20131031 10:05:15 * bbbruce_ (~bx@anon) Quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
20131031 10:14:43 * monsieur_max (~maxime@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131031 10:41:28 * bbbruce (~bx@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131031 10:46:42 <sgothel> @Mark: .. guess it was the string buffer inside the jenkins ..
20131031 10:46:51 <sgothel> @Brice: Does my 'cleanup' work ?
20131031 10:47:26 <sgothel> https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=875 .. that is ..
20131031 12:46:53 * monsieur_max (~maxime@anon) Quit (Quit: Leaving.)
20131031 12:55:09 <rmk0> sgothel: ah, yeah... the tests do produce a lot of output
20131031 12:55:19 <sgothel> works now :)
20131031 12:55:22 <rmk0> would it be preferable to silence them.. i didn't consider it might be too much
20131031 12:55:27 <rmk0> ?
20131031 12:55:32 <sgothel> silenced ..
20131031 12:55:36 <rmk0> hehe, right
20131031 12:56:09 <rmk0> shouldn't have taken nine minutes, though
20131031 12:56:18 <rmk0> they run in about ten seconds here
20131031 12:57:03 <sgothel> was not 'locked' .. now using singleton lock .. memory .. blabla .. was much faster standalone local sure
20131031 12:57:25 <rmk0> jenkins is weird
20131031 12:57:36 * rmk0 kicks it
20131031 13:38:35 <sgothel> 2.1.2-rc-20131031 http://jogamp.org/deployment/archive/master/gluegen_740-joal_494-jogl_1131-jocl_870/
20131031 13:38:55 <sgothel> maven test repo .. pushed
20131031 13:53:21 <sgothel> http://jogamp.org/deployment/archive/master/gluegen_740-joal_494-jogl_1131-jocl_870-signed/
20131031 13:54:01 <sgothel> the graph-gpu demos now load the font jar online at runtime, or via classpath (cp-font)
20131031 15:44:00 <bbbruce> sgothel: did you see my bug description I wrote here some days back?
20131031 16:16:27 <hharrison> sgothel: jogl-all under 1MB, seriously?
20131031 16:31:37 * kermyt (~kermyt@anon) Quit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
20131031 16:35:38 * kermyt (~kermyt@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131031 16:59:51 <hharrison> sgothel: working on a Java3d-pre9, I see you did a bit more work on the GLCanvas visibility bug...should I round up the usual testers?
20131031 17:35:16 * [Mike] (~Mike]@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131031 18:41:34 * monsieur_max (~maxime@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131031 18:48:59 <hharrison> sgothel: thanks a lot for the font removal, that's a big savings for us!!
20131031 18:49:37 <rmk0> .o.
20131031 18:49:41 * rmk0 eyes font removal
20131031 18:49:56 <rmk0> think this means the "maven android" instructions need updating
20131031 18:50:10 <hharrison> I think they were left in the android bundle
20131031 18:50:33 <hharrison> just jogl-all went on a diet
20131031 18:50:54 <rmk0> i forget how big it was before
20131031 18:51:35 * monsieur_max (~maxime@anon) Quit (Quit: Leaving.)
20131031 18:51:44 <hharrison> For me 4.3MB -> 2.9 MB
20131031 18:51:59 <rmk0> hm, right
20131031 20:44:58 <sgothel> and jogl-util-graph ..
20131031 20:45:25 <sgothel> but packk200 file is .9 MB :)
20131031 20:47:22 <sgothel> 2.3M -> 882K
20131031 20:51:10 <sgothel> @Harvey: Sure .. testing is welcome
20131031 20:51:32 <sgothel> @Brice: No response from you == good news I guess :) Have you verified ?
20131031 20:54:07 <sgothel> pack200 jogl-all: turns our that the fonts cannot be compressed that well: note: don't pack200 or gz the fonts when deploying
20131031 21:12:53 <hharrison> what's the best toolchai for pack200?
20131031 21:13:12 <sgothel> err .. pack200 in JDK ?
20131031 21:13:27 <hharrison> OK, just the regular jar toolchain then...jsut making sure
20131031 21:13:29 <sgothel> still using java6's .. there was a bug in java7's pack200 :)
20131031 21:13:38 <sgothel> dunno if it's fixed ..
20131031 21:13:43 <hharrison> Yeah...that's the question I was asking
20131031 21:14:21 <sgothel> we got great feedback .. and I guess all late regressions are fixed
20131031 21:14:47 <sgothel> so .. I will down the other bug .. and 2.1.2 is done .. if nothing else comes up :)
20131031 21:15:14 <sgothel> the font jar was a warm-up for 'how to provide' ffmpeg 'plugin' :)
20131031 21:15:28 <hharrison> The release train has been working pretty well from my POV. Keep up the great work.
20131031 21:16:00 <sgothel> Thx to Julien for starting those release wiki pages originally
20131031 21:17:19 <sgothel> .. and thx to all of us ofc :)
20131031 21:18:12 <sgothel> funny .. Linux/FF .. applet's always start a new VM .. where on windows it's reused ..
20131031 21:18:48 <sgothel> and w/ those dialog boxes .. guess I need to sign the test jars :-/
20131031 21:19:42 <hharrison> Indeed, it feels like there's been an uptick in the past few months of more people joining the jogl fun
20131031 21:20:52 <hharrison> hmm, weird, I don't see much savings with pack200, maybe I'm 'Doing it wrong'
20131031 21:21:11 <sgothel> http://jogamp.org/deployment/archive/master/gluegen_740-joal_494-jogl_1131-jocl_870-signed/jar/?C=N;O=A
20131031 21:21:21 <sgothel> jogl-all.jar.pack.gz31-Oct-2013 14:41 882K
20131031 21:21:31 <sgothel> ogl-all.jar.pack.gz19-Oct-2013 07:24 2.3M 
20131031 21:22:51 <sgothel> jogamp-scripting/deployment/funcs_jars_pack_sign.sh <- how we use it
20131031 21:23:49 <sgothel> order: wsdir_jars_repack, wsdir_jars_sign, wsdir_jars_pack200
20131031 21:25:01 <sgothel> pack200 '-E9 --segment-limit=-1'
20131031 21:25:19 <sgothel> repack200: --repack
20131031 21:27:04 <hharrison> well damn, that's a lot of savings, now I need to look at my deployment strategy, see what that does to startup time
20131031 21:28:31 <sgothel> you need to change the web server config ..
20131031 21:28:51 <hharrison> I'm looking at our exe wrapper, appears to support pack200
20131031 21:29:13 <sgothel> /srv/www/jogamp.org/deployment/.htaccess <- our magic ..
20131031 21:29:28 <hharrison> We deploy @work as a single exe file...super convenient, no install
20131031 21:29:59 <sgothel> oh .. yup, pack200 is opaque .. i.e. can be takes as a jar ..
20131031 21:30:17 <sgothel> if you find an xz bootstrap in java - I guess same thing :)
20131031 21:30:36 <sgothel> or jnlp+pack200
20131031 21:56:19 <sgothel> https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=881 .. added
20131101 00:13:30 * hharrison (~chatzilla@anon) Quit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.90.1 [Firefox 25.0/20131025150754])
20131101 02:09:32 <sgothel> https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=884 <- anybody ?
20131101 02:10:48 <sgothel> Assigning it to Harvey, since he mentioned he has an interest - but posting it here for all to grab - if willing to complete in short time :)
20131101 02:27:48 * [Mike] (~Mike]@anon) Quit ()
20131101 03:30:26 * [Mike] (~Mike]@anon) has joined #jogamp
20131101 04:05:45 <sgothel> Q: Compatibility mode - Unbind VAO also unbinds currently bound VBO (i.e. from VAO setup) ? I couldn't find anything in the spec - and test shows no picture .. (Bug 692 Comment 5)
20131101 04:06:35 <sgothel> hence I do assume we shall not clear bound VBO when unbinding VAO in GLBufferStateTracker .. (our sanity checks)
20131101 04:58:39 <sgothel> yup .. ^^ correct
20131101 05:05:51 -jogamp- Continue @ http://jogamp.org/log/irc/jogamp_20131101050551.html