Bug 85 - Weekly builds / source
Summary: Weekly builds / source
Alias: None
Product: Jogl
Classification: JogAmp
Component: core (show other bugs)
Version: 1
Hardware: All all
: P1 normal
Assignee: Sven Gothel
: 83 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Reported: 2004-05-07 05:51 CEST by Sven Gothel
Modified: 2015-09-27 03:15 CEST (History)
0 users

See Also:
SCM Refs:
Workaround: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sven Gothel 2010-03-24 07:46:36 CET

---- Reported by petermantell 2004-05-07 05:51:46 ----

We have a firewall here that prevents us from accessing CVS. So to get the JOGL 
source we need to go to a different machine, do a CVS checkout, then burn the 
results to a CD to transfer them into the network.

I find this prohibitively difficult - it takes too long to do on the off chance 
that it might fix the problems I have with JOGL.

Firewalls aside, do you guys really want it to be difficult for people to use 
your product? Doing a cvs checkout is hardly simple if you're a new user.

So I suggest that you start to provide weekly (or appropriately frequent) 
packages of JOGL, either containing source code or even platform specific 

This will help industry acceptance of JOGL. I'm sorry, but if its hard to get 
at, I just won't bother.


---- Additional Comments From kbr 2004-07-16 11:05:11 ----

Support for building source archives for the jogl and jogl-demos workspaces has
been added to the respective build.xml files. Forthcoming beta and final JOGL
releases will contain source archives. The nightly build system needs
maintenance work to utilize this support, so for now please look to the official

---- Additional Comments From kbr 2004-07-16 11:06:35 ----

*** Issue 83 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

--- Bug imported by sgothel@jausoft.com 2010-03-24 07:46 EDT  ---

This bug was previously known as _bug_ 85 at https://jogl.dev.java.net/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=85

Unknown bug field "has_duplicates" encountered while moving bug
     <when>2004-07-16 11:06:35</when>

Comment 1 Sven Gothel 2010-03-24 07:55:46 CET
*** Bug 83 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***