953 – Allow the creation of a BufferedImage from a TextureData

Bug 953 - Allow the creation of a BufferedImage from a TextureData

Summary: Allow the creation of a BufferedImage from a TextureData

Status:	CONFIRMED

Alias:	None

Product:	Jogl
Classification:	JogAmp
Component:	awt (show other bugs)
Version:	3.0.0
Hardware:	All all

Importance:	P5 enhancement
Assignee:	Julien Gouesse

URL:

Depends on:
Blocks:	968
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2014-01-29 15:23 CET by Julien Gouesse
Modified:	2023-07-12 01:55 CEST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Type:	FEATURE
SCM Refs:	ec2d94ca26ddab8ec67135ebc5f2d0a43f6a4c25
Workaround:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Julien Gouesse 2014-01-29 15:23:47 CET

It's currently possible to wrap a BufferedImage into an AWTTextureData but creating a BufferedImage from a TextureData isn't possible yet.

This feature would be useful in frameworks based on JOGL (especially Ardor3D) which use TextureIO to create their "own" images and which need to allow the developers to convert their images into AWT images to display them in a Swing/AWT/Netbeans Platform GUI.

Comment 1 Sven Gothel 2014-07-10 14:11:58 CEST

This can be already achieved via AWTGLReadBufferUtil,
see commit http://jogamp.org/git/?p=jogl.git;a=commit;h=ec2d94ca26ddab8ec67135ebc5f2d0a43f6a4c25

See: TestBug461FBOSupersamplingSwingAWT, TestBug605FlippedImageAWT

http://jogamp.org/git/?p=jogl.git;a=blob;f=src/test/com/jogamp/opengl/test/junit/jogl/caps/TestBug605FlippedImageAWT.java;h=c1b29b371e9599dda0fca619c8c2c41f96671b10;hb=ec2d94ca26ddab8ec67135ebc5f2d0a43f6a4c25#l91

Comment 2 Sven Gothel 2014-07-10 14:14:00 CEST

Re-opened - I see, yes, we need to utilize code of AWTGLReadBufferUtil
to produce an BufferedImage for pre-existing TextureData.

Sorry for my confusion.

Comment 3 Sven Gothel 2019-03-30 02:05:45 CET

Julien, I push your task to version 2.5.0.
We may need to discuss this a bit further?

Comment 4 Julien Gouesse 2019-03-30 09:01:33 CET

(In reply to Sven Gothel from comment #3)
> Julien, I push your task to version 2.5.0.
> We may need to discuss this a bit further?

It's ok for me. Thanks.